Handouts
Download in alternate formats:
RTF (8KB) |
PDF (84KB)
Behavioral Ecology IB 146, Spring 2004
ARTICLE CRITIQUE #1 (25 points)
due Wednesday, February 4 at beginning of lecture
Article: Madden, J.R. and Balmford, A. 2004. Spotted bowerbirds Chlamydera
maculata do not prefer rare or costly bower decorations. Behavioral Ecology
and Sociobiology. <submitted online- no page numbers yet!>
This article may be found online by finding the SpringerLink page for Behavioral
Ecology and Sociobiology (use a search engine), click ‘Online First’,
then scroll down until you see the papers available January 09, 2004. We’ll
try to put a link on the course website as well.
Assignment: Read the full article. Then, in 1-2 pages type written pages, please
provide a critique of the paper. The purpose of this assignment is to make
sure you can take a study from the primary literature, identify the specific
hypotheses under consideration, how they were tested, and how the results relate
to the hypotheses in question. Some general tips to get you started.
1. Start your critique with a brief summary of the research problem addressed
in the article. This should be in your own words and should indicate that you
understand the primary objective(s) of the study. Include here statements of
the adaptive hypotheses that the authors are testing.
2. Provide a short overview of the methods used in the study and the primary
results obtained. Again, this is your way of indicating that you have a general
understanding of the article.
3. The bulk of the critique (again, only 2 pages!) should be your evaluation
of the authors’ work. Were the techniques they used appropriate? Are
the results and conclusions presented in the paper consistent with the methods
used? If you were going to do this study, what, if anything, would you do differently?
4. Remember – a critique doesn’t have to be all negative! It’s
perfectly legitimate to decide that the authors did an OK job!
5. Whether you are positive or negative about the authors’ work, you
should back up your evaluation. For examples, don’t just tell us that
the methods were inappropriate – explain why you arrived at the conclusion
that you did and indicate what information in the paper contributed to your
point of view.
6. In terms of grading critiques, we are looking for evidence that you carefully
read and evaluated the article. Although there may be some general points that
we expect you to pick up on, we will be looking primarily at your arguments
as to why the work was appropriate or not. There is no right or wrong answer
for a critique!